Ad Rates                Ad Index
Join Escapees Special Offers Discussion Forum Commercial Directory Parks and Parking Whats's Hot Groups and Events Club Benefits Resources and Links Store Home Home
    Escapees Discussion Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Escapees Old Discussion Forum  Hop To Forums  Technical Tips and Tricks    Fire and Cummins engines??

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Picture of BrianT
Posted
In my travels online, I have come across a number of people who have taken their Ford trucks and done an aftermarket install of a B series Cummins engine.

I've considered doing such at some point if/when the 7.3 gives up the ghost in my F-350. I really like the 7.3s but the stuff built around them seems to be what kills them... turbos going bad, that kind of thing.

But in looking for a possible 5.9 Cummins to install, I keep running across engine after engine after engine that's been in/through a fire.

What's up with that? Anybody know what the source of many of these fires might be? It's someting I'd want to explore for sure as I wouldn't want to install an engine with a higher probablity of fire if there are certain years or builds that could be avoided to avoid the problem(s).

Does anybody know if they had a certain electrical problem? A fuel leak problem? An oil leak problem? I would think with as many fires as I've noted that there must be similarities that pop up and even fixes so that those things specifically don't pop up.

Curious,

Brian


2004 Glendale Titanium 32E37DS with bug room
2001 Ford F-350 dually with 7.3 Turbo Diesel
 
Posts: 1502 | Location: Choctaw, MS / Slidell, LA / Sioux Falls, SD | Registered: October 04, 2005Report This Post
Picture of Ray,IN
Posted Hide Post
Your post is the very first I've heard of this. Visit dodgeram.org to research on this subject.
I remember back about 2004/5 the maintence department at Cummins/Columbus,IN plant, had a few Fords with Cummins B 5.9 engines in them.
If you are shopping for a B 5.9, look through auto-rv.com magazine. There is a company in Terre Haute, IN selling Cummins test engines.
Matching a newer 24V engine would be a major task. The Cummins computer would likely argue with the Ford computer.


"As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances there is a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air - however slight - lest we become unwitting victims of darkness."___Supreme Court Justice William Douglas
 
Posts: 1631 | Location: North America(somewhere) | Registered: April 02, 2002Report This Post
Picture of BrianT
Posted Hide Post
Hi Ray,

I never did find much online about fire and the B5.9. But there are numerous notations of fire damage on a website that I use when looking for parts. (Probably several hundred listings for the 5.9 engines and maybe around a dozen notations of fire.)

I thought maybe there was something in particular that was recalled or maybe noted when owning a Cummins. Guess not.

The 12V engines are pretty easy to install, less complicated. And some people are tuning them up to put out a comparable HP (reliably) to the 24V and the Common Rail engines. The 24V is a little more complicated as it does have it's own computer. And the Common Rail engines are even more complicated to install than the 24V.

I dunno which way I might be inclined towards. The 12V "tweaked" may be a pretty nice setup and would have all the power I'd need. I don't know if I'd gain in significant performance or economy by going to a 24V or a Common Rail engine.

Thanks for the input.

Brian


2004 Glendale Titanium 32E37DS with bug room
2001 Ford F-350 dually with 7.3 Turbo Diesel
 
Posts: 1502 | Location: Choctaw, MS / Slidell, LA / Sioux Falls, SD | Registered: October 04, 2005Report This Post
Picture of Stanley P. Miller
Posted Hide Post
Don't forget a bucket to carry the Ford tranny parts...

Seriously, if you swap do the engine and transmission together both for reliability, compatibility and repair issues.


Stan, E-Mail: skp-forum-01 at stanmiller.info
 
Posts: 9896 | Location: Gilbert, Arizona | Registered: April 01, 2002Report This Post
Picture of Ray,IN
Posted Hide Post
Brian, the 12V engines are very stout. Scheid Diesel of Effingham,IL runs an unlimited pulling truck. A 1997 Dodge K3500, with the 12V engine reliably producing over 1,000HP, and well over 2,000 lb/ft torque!


"As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances there is a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be aware of change in the air - however slight - lest we become unwitting victims of darkness."___Supreme Court Justice William Douglas
 
Posts: 1631 | Location: North America(somewhere) | Registered: April 02, 2002Report This Post
Picture of BrianT
Posted Hide Post
Hi Stan,

I'm not sure what Dodge is using for manual transmissions. My Ford has a ZF-6 (six speed manual) in it.

The mating process isn't all that difficult from the Cummins to the ZF-6. Just wondering if the Dodge would be different or better?

Thanks for the input.

Brian


2004 Glendale Titanium 32E37DS with bug room
2001 Ford F-350 dually with 7.3 Turbo Diesel
 
Posts: 1502 | Location: Choctaw, MS / Slidell, LA / Sioux Falls, SD | Registered: October 04, 2005Report This Post
Picture of BrianT
Posted Hide Post
Wow, Ray, I don't know what I'd do with 1000HP.

Eek

Actually, I had something more along the lines of maybe 325HP in mind, which is quite doable without much fuss or worry.

Not trying to win any races. Just wanna get there safely and with as little worries as possible.

Who knows, maybe the 7.3 will run for a while.

Wink

But just in case... thanks for the thoughts.

Brian


2004 Glendale Titanium 32E37DS with bug room
2001 Ford F-350 dually with 7.3 Turbo Diesel
 
Posts: 1502 | Location: Choctaw, MS / Slidell, LA / Sioux Falls, SD | Registered: October 04, 2005Report This Post
Posted Hide Post
Brian,

You might want to do a cost evaluation to see
if this engine swap would really be any better
than a fresh 7.3 motor.

I have a 2004 F350 6.0/auto and at 81K it popped
a headgasket so I took it into the Ford dealer
under the 100K warranty.

They pulled the motor and pulled the heads
off and found damage to the cyclinder walls
on a number of cyclinders.....long story short
Ford paid to put a fresh 6.0 in my truck.
Cost to them was $12K, I paid my $100 plus had
the radiator redone and hoses/belts done.


Phil & Berta
2004 Terry 25 RKS Extreme
2004 Ford F350 4 dr 4X4 Diesel
Fullerton, CA
 
Posts: 224 | Location: Fullerton, CA | Registered: April 04, 2002Report This Post
Picture of BrianT
Posted Hide Post
Hi Phil,

For cost of replacement, going with a fresh rebuild of either a 7.3 or a 5.9, there's not a lot of difference. I did the fresh 7.3 a while back and it's still doing great. But I had wondered if I were faced with that again in the future whether I might try the 5.9 swap.

Hopefully, it'll be a long time!

Smile

Brian


2004 Glendale Titanium 32E37DS with bug room
2001 Ford F-350 dually with 7.3 Turbo Diesel
 
Posts: 1502 | Location: Choctaw, MS / Slidell, LA / Sioux Falls, SD | Registered: October 04, 2005Report This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

    Escapees Discussion Forum  Hop To Forum Categories  Escapees Old Discussion Forum  Hop To Forums  Technical Tips and Tricks    Fire and Cummins engines??

The Escapees Discussion forum has moved to a new home! Please use www.rvnetwork.com to access the new forum, or click on the Discussion Forum link on any Escapees.com webpage header. Thanks!

All user accounts have been moved to the new board, but each user will need to go through the lost password process to re-activate their username. You will have to click on “login” and then on “Lost Password”. Enter either your forum login name or your forum email address. The forum will email you password recovery instructions. Follow these to get a temporary password, then log in and change your password to whatever you like on your profile page.

Once you are able to log in, you should find that all the current topics are where they belong, and you can begin learning about some of the new board's features. If you have questions, post them in the "Learning the new forum" area and we'll do our best to help. The new board is very similar in functionality to the old one, but some things will seem quite different at first. There is a pretty good help function on the new board. Just click on "Help" in the upper right corner of the page header.

In most cases, the best way to learn the new board is to experiment! If you are not sure what something does, click on it! You'll notice that we have created a test area where you can post tests to your heart's content. We have also created a “Learning the new forum” area so that users can assist each other in learning the new board.

All users will need to set up their avatars again. For those users that we host, there is an avatar set called “Old forum user avatars” that contains all of the custom avatars currently hosted by us. Just browse through it until you find your own picture, and select it. (Please don't select someone else's picture just to be cute!)

If your avatar is currently hosted somewhere else, you will need to have that URL available in order to set up your avatar on the new board. If you prefer to use a stock avatar, we have a large assortment of new avatars you can choose from in the avatar Base Gallery.

The old forum remains available for login. Even though there are no active or visible forums here, you can still log in and access your profile pages to recover any info you need. This old board will shut down permanently at the end of September.